What if I Have Conflicting Info? Is That OK?
“What if I find two different answers? Should I worry?” Many of us encounter those same questions on our journey to uncover our family's history. Conflicting evidence is not a rarity. As we sift through the vast array of records and documents available to us, it's not uncommon to encounter discrepancies and contradictions that can leave us scratching our heads. This blog post is all about why resolving conflicts in our research is crucial - including some practical strategies for doing so through reason and analysis.
Understanding the Importance of Resolving Conflicts
Before we dive into the process of resolving conflicts, let's take a moment to understand why this step is so critical in genealogy research. Conflicting evidence can undermine the credibility and reliability of our research, leading to inaccurate conclusions and flawed family trees. By addressing discrepancies head-on and resolving them to the best of our ability, we can ensure that our research is grounded in solid evidence and worthy of preservation for future generations.
Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflicts
Now that we've established the importance of resolving conflicts, let's explore some practical strategies for doing so effectively in your genealogy research:
Identify the Nature of the Conflict: The first step in resolving conflicts is to identify the nature of the discrepancy. Is it a factual error, a transcription mistake, or a genuine contradiction in the evidence? By understanding the nature of the conflict, you can better determine the appropriate course of action.
Consult Multiple Sources: When faced with conflicting evidence, consult multiple sources to corroborate or refute the information in question. Look for primary sources, such as birth certificates, census records, and military records, which are generally more reliable than secondary or derivative sources.
Analyze the Context: Consider the context in which the conflicting evidence was created. Was there a reason for the discrepancy, such as human error, cultural differences, or variations in record-keeping practices? By analyzing the context surrounding the conflicting evidence, you may gain valuable insights into its reliability and significance.
Apply Occam's Razor: When evaluating conflicting evidence, apply the principle of Occam's Razor, which states that the simplest explanation is often the correct one. Look for the solution that requires the fewest assumptions and the least complexity. However, be cautious not to overlook valid evidence in favor of a simpler explanation.
Seek Additional Information: If you're unable to resolve the conflict based on the available evidence, seek out additional information that may help shed light on the situation. Consult other genealogists, historical experts, or specialized resources to gain a deeper understanding of the problem and explore alternative perspectives.
Document Your Thoughts: As you work through the process of resolving conflicts, document your analysis and reasoning in detail. Record the sources you consulted, the conclusions you drew, and any uncertainties or unresolved questions that remain. This will not only help you track your progress but also provide transparency and accountability in your research.
Resolving conflicts in genealogy research is a critical step in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of our findings. By approaching discrepancies with patience, diligence, and a commitment to reasoned analysis, we can untangle the web of conflicting evidence and draw reliable conclusions about our family's history. Remember, genealogy research is a journey filled with twists and turns, but by confronting conflicts head-on and applying sound research practices, we can navigate the complexities of our ancestors' lives with confidence and clarity.
Want a FREE presentation for your genealogy society? or a private webinar for a group of genealogy friends? We can do that! We will even set the Zoom session up for you. Check out the presentation page here. It's EASY!
Comments